Law school counterpunches

Graduate school counterpunches Graduate school counterpunches As more law offices join the Morgan Lewis temporary fad, dropping their late spring partner programs (an advancement Legal OnRamps Paul Lippe compared to Armageddon), its no uncertainty fulfilling to certain understudies to see one graduate school strike back, though with a blow that is more signal than poke. As Above the Law reports today, Fordham Law School has prohibited Reed Smith from its grounds for a long time as a result of the organizations absence of demonstrable skill in belatedly pulling out of the nearby enrolling process this year (the firm is as yet facilitating a mid year program; it simply chose not to meet at Fordham to staff it).In related news, Lippe offers more thoughts on how graduate schools may better plan legal advisors for what's to come. While he makes various valid statements, his reason strikes me as unduly tight, centered for what it's worth around corporate clientsthats OK on the off chance that you take a gander at law as only a help industry, however I concur with the remarks by Ray Campbell (visiting educator at Penn State) proposing that the investigation of law is in factand ought to bemore: Is being a legal advisor pretty much serving paying customers? Not to decrease the significance of offering marvelous assistance to customers, yet I think an attorney's obligations are more nuanced than that. You can be an extraordinary, customer situated legal advisor and watch out for the greater game, however you reduce the calling and short sell what graduate schools need to do on the off chance that you take too limited a perspective on an attorney's job in the public eye.- posted by vera